DeviantART is counting down to its 100 millionth deviation! Join in on the fun and take a look back at some of the most noteworthy deviations we've seen along the way. The deviant who uploads the 100 millionth deviation could win a special prize, too. Hurry, we're going to hit the 100 million mark soon!














Critiques
1. I don't like the horizontal line cutting through the header. At first, I thought it was frame border showing on beta version. The idea of such a line is definitely nice, it separates the header and supports the hint of modern feel introduced by the footer, but maybe you could change its looks?
2. When I first saw the search field, I thought it was an error. It should be on the top, I agree, but it shouldn't stick out of the sidebar. Something in the graphics could suggest that the right edge of the sidebar is not solid and stuff can poke through there.
3. I'm sorry, but I had to lower the mark for technique mainly due to the font. Kunstler Script is definitely not OS-friendly font. There are actually only 8-10 fonts that can be found on all systems, though one could argue that Linux users won't view your site because they can't run Photoshop. Anyway, I don't have Kunstler Script on my new XP laptop and I remember I installed it manually on my old desktop.
Moreover, the font is very ornate and hard to read. It's not bad as menu (which can be done as static images) but it puzzled me for a split second as sidebar headers. Employing cufon etc to handle it would be like killing a fly with a cannon, so maybe you could change the font to something OS-friendly with oblique style? Or, if you have predefined sidebar headers, just use the images too.
4. The subheaders in the sidebar (those which go to the right) disturb the flow of the text. I think they would look better centered or slightly shifted from center to the right, but not aligned fully to the right like in current version.
5. The sidebar itself looks pretty, but after some consideration I decided it's a little too dark. It goes well with overall design, but when viewing only portion of the website (like on my laptop; I have 1280x1024 monitor for my desktop and it's okay there) it tends to dominate the screen and drive my attention from the content.
6. I like the fonts and colors used to format the content. It looks very elegant while still retaining the modern look. The only thing I would suggest is to give it more breathing space. The date is very close to the header... though admittedly I wouldn't distance them, just make the date color brighter so that it doesn't pop out that much.
Also, there could be more space between the entries.
7. I like the white border around the content box. It's very modest and nearly unnoticeable but it does good job in making the content stand out from the background.
8. I have an impression that the top part of the layout is heavier than the rest. It might be the menu and the search bar being in one line and thus taking all free space there. Also, sidebar and content are visually close to each other, which should be solved if you decide to shift sidebar subheaders to the left. If it doesn't work, the left padding of the content can be made wider (it looks narrower than the right padding at the moment, so no harm would be done, I think).
9. RSS feed is OK where it is. I checked how firefox and ie handle rss and there's usually separate button offered by browser interface so that the user doesn't need to search for feed on the site. Opera has such button in address bar and I have to say I've never even tried to add a feed in other way.
The rss icon is very blue right now... users expect it to be orange. Maybe you could change the color so that it hints that it was orange in its previous life?
Subscription placement is ok - just where I would be looking for it if I wanted to subscribe.
10. I absolutely love the reflection effect under the sidebar and content boxes. ^^ The tag cloud looks very stylish and neat. It's quite a rare place for tag cloud, but it looks like it belongs there. Aesthetically, the cloud's perfect. In practical sense though it would be uncomfortable to use since you have to scroll all the way down to reach it. Nevertheless, there's no place for it on the rest of the page, so it can stay there. It looks pretty enough to have an excuse
11. The footer rocks. It's very dark, which makes it appear as if it was separate from the rest of the page, but the coffee links it with the layout theme. Very nice effect, I applaud you for it
The bold font stands out compared to the delicate cloud above, but it doesn't disturb anything.
12. The layout is very, very beautiful.
(I just realized that it's indeed pinkish on my laptop display. It's more like violet/beige on my desktop and I think I like that color more. Oh well. It's still beautiful.)
13. The site's killed on IE6. There's a thin white line severing sidebar under search field. Content div is shifted to the left. Sidebar div is floating under content and it's shifted to the right. One can still read stuff, but IE6 kind of defeated the purpose of having practical menu in the sidebar.
14. Regarding the title... It's commong practice to include site title, but I don't think you have space for that. It should be somewhere on the top and the header's heavy enough in the current version. Anything more and it would be overloaded.
In my opinion, you can skip the title. It's not like it's your company's site and you have to beat the identity into everyone's brains.
Summing up, I'm amazed how well you managed to combine the delicate, elegant and ornate look with modern-style layout. Great job!
Previous PageNext PageThank you for your Critique
You are not logged in.